Unlike Fine, Gelfand resigned directly after noticing he was lost. Many other variations exist where a queen is lost in the opening, but those two examples may show how similar ideas in different positions can lead to different ideas of a queen being dominated. While in both cases a knight was sacrificed to “win” a rook, at least in the idea of the attacker, using a fork on f3/f6 to a king on d1/d8 and rook on h1/h8 as the idea of the sacrifice, this is mainly coincidental. (Fine - Yudovich, position before 8.-a:b5) On 8.N:d5: Fine had to play 8.Qa4 Bd7 9.c:d5 Qb6 10.Be3 B:b5 11.B:b6 B:a4 12.N:a4 Bb4+ 13.Kd1 with an equal game, for example 13.-Nbd7 14.a3 N:d5 15.a:b4 N7:b6 16.N:b6 N:b6, and the bishop against knight is compensation for the doubled pawns and lacking development, so the game should be equal. Instead of resigning, he dragged the game on for another 30 moves, but Yudovich won easily. After 11.Qd2 B:d2+ 12.K:d2 g:f6 13.a:b5 Be6 White was a piece down. It turns out that there is a hole in Fine’s calculations. This move is made to lure Black into a trap: 7.-a6 fails to 8.N:d5 a:b5 9.N:f6+ g:f6 10.Q:d8+ K:d8 11.B:f6+ and 12.B:h8, with White winning. Reuben Fine - Mikhail Yudovich, USSR Championship, 14 March 1937ġ.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Nf3 c5 5.Bg5 c:d4 6.Nxd4 e5 7.Ndb5 Reuben Fine wrote books about openings, but this didn’t protect him from falling into an opening trap himself. Indeed, in practical play it is a rare but not unheard occurrence that a queen is trapped. The queen can be freed, but after 17.-Nc6 18.d:c6 Q:c6 19.h6 Black has no realistic chances of saving the game and instead would painfully be destroyed. Gelfand’s entire kingside action seemed very dubious in this game. He immediately lost his match advantage in round 8 with a dubious tactical idea. After six draws, Boris Gelfand had won the previous game. It seems unexpected that Her Majesty can be trapped on the chessboard, as Boris Gelfand also proved many years ago. Unsurprisingly, a great part of the book is dedicated to trapping the queen, a powerful pieces with many available squares on an empty board. Georg Bernhardt, Ervin Voellmy MT 1952, 2nd prize. Four of them are by Rinck, one by Prokes. The thoroughness of the research is shown by the inclusion of five endgame studies where two rooks and a minor piece win against two rooks and a minor pieces. In his book, Kasparyan sorts dominations by the material used and then by the patterns used. Kasparyan believes that trapping a piece in various ways also should be regarded as domination, such as geometric patterns, pinning, zugzwang, and much more. Historically it was used to denote White controlling specific squares to attack and capture a Black piece, defeating Black by material. Kasparyan writes that Henri Rinck introduced the term “domination”, but it should be viewed on a broader plane. Krwovtaz, the book was published in 1980 by Progress Publishers in Moscow. Some classical dominations by Siegfried Horneckerįirst published in Russian in 1974 as “Shakhmatnye etyudy dominatzija”, which would translate to “Domination chess studies”, and with the revised Russian text translated into English by A. Still no ChessBase Account? learn more > The ultimate chess experience every day, Pla圜 welcomes 20,000 chess players from all around the world – from beginner to grandmaster.Memorize it easily move by move by playing against the variation trainer. Still no ChessBase Account? learn more > Learn openings the right way! Build and maintain your repertoire.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |